Already a member?
Sign in
Welcome! Wikis are websites that everyone can build together. It's easy!
Location: hk sand storm
Discussion: hk sand storm
Keyword tags:
cool new machine
Watch
 T-frenzy |
hk sand storm
Nov 17 2007, 3:30 PM EST please tell me what you think,thank you Do you find this valuable? |
 craigterminator |
RE: hk sand storm
Nov 19 2007, 1:33 PM EST i say this is nice work we did, make more 0 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Xenomorphine Xenomorphine |
RE: hk sand storm
Nov 26 2007, 12:04 PM EST Much better than a lot of the crappy designs put on there. :) However, plasma would be an energy weapon, not high-explosive. Do you find this valuable? |
 LaLongeCarabine |
RE: hk sand storm
Jun 19 2008, 9:56 PM EDT Actualy shaped charges make plasma jets. There fore they are high-explosive. Plasma is hard to produce in a stand off weapon. I used plasma torches to cut sheet metal and it's like hot knife throught the congeled animal fat. I don't see what good a weapon it would be, plus you're plugged into the wall I can't see a battery pack that would generate a plasma 'beam'. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Xenomorphine Xenomorphine |
RE: hk sand storm
Jun 20 2008, 11:34 AM EDT "Actualy shaped charges make plasma jets. There fore they are high-explosive.Oh, absolutely! However, I was just trying to correct their sentence structure: "Plasma attacks from high explosive attacks", does not make sense. Either it's one or the other. If they mean anti-armour munitions, then they should state it. Using that particular phrase was just misleadingly confusing. Plasma weapons, yeah, they're not very practical! There is an essay at the www.stardestroyer.net site, which goes into detail about why it would be such an unlikely device, that nobody would really bother trying to make them. Particle beams and LASERs are much more effective. :) Do you find this valuable? |